Virtuous Arguments:To say that the state that is current of discourse is abysmal appears self-evident.
The Rush Limbaugh debate as well as other types of governmental incivility point to the necessity for the form of instruction available in many first-year writing courses, writes John Duffy.
Of the many terms that could be placed on Rush Limbaugh’s comments that are recent Georgetown University legislation pupil Sandra Fluke — “vile,” “misogynistic” and “repulsive” spring to mind — one word who has room into the conversation is “shock.” Limbaugh has made a career that is phenomenally lucrative of remarks, mocking ladies, minorities, and many more with gleeful impunity. In performing this, he’s got inspired a tiny but disproportionately noisy military of imitators on talk radio, cable tv, and, increasingly, when you look at the halls of Congress, whose rhetorical strategies of misinformation, demonization, incendiary metaphors, and poisonous historic analogies have inked much to debase discourse that is public.
Toxic rhetoric is now a reality of every day life, a type of activity, and a business item. Apart from Limbaugh, the rhetorical that is contemporary features pundits such as for example Glenn Beck, who once mused on-air about killing a general public official by having a shovel, and talk radio host Neal Boortz, who compared Muslims to “cockroaches.” Politicians may be similarly unpleasant.